Summary
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed the revocation of Anthony David McWilliams’s deferred-adjudication community supervision, adjudication of guilt, and nine-year prison sentence for possession of methamphetamine. The court conducted an independent Anders review, found no arguable grounds for appeal, and granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Holdings
- After reviewing the record and counsel's Anders brief, the court found nothing that would arguably support an appeal and therefore affirmed the trial court's judgment.
- The Anders brief complied with applicable requirements, and the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw.
Questions Presented
- Whether independent review of the record under Anders disclosed any arguable ground for reversible error.
- Whether appointed appellate counsel should be permitted to withdraw after filing an Anders brief that complied with applicable requirements.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (9)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)(applied)
- In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 n.9, 408–09, 411 n.35 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding)(applied)
- Hawkins v. State, 112 S.W.3d 340, 343–44 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2003, no pet.)(cited)
- Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 n.3, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(applied)
- High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978)(applied)
- Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(applied)
- Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988)(applied)
- Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(applied)
- Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…