Summary
The Texas Thirteenth Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The court held that orders denying a plea in abatement and striking a plea in intervention were not final, appealable orders, and no statutory exception applied. The court granted the appellees’ motions to dismiss and dismissed the related motions as moot.
Holdings
- The court of appeals lacked jurisdiction because the orders were not final judgments and were not statutorily authorized interlocutory orders.
Questions Presented
- Whether the orders denying the plea in abatement and striking the plea in intervention were final, appealable orders.
- Whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction over the attempted appeal in the absence of a final judgment or statutory authorization for an interlocutory appeal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)(followed)
- Metromedia Long Distance, Inc. v. Hughes, 810 S.W.2d 494, 499 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1991, writ denied)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…