In re Margarito Trujillo

No. 13-18-00381-CV · Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg · August 3, 2018 · No. 13-18-00381-CV

Summary

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas considered Margarito Trujillo’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel withdrawal of a trial court order granting turnover relief and appointing a receiver. The court held that Trujillo had not shown entitlement to mandamus relief and denied the petition.

Holdings

  1. Trujillo did not demonstrate that he was entitled to mandamus relief; the petition was therefore denied.
  2. A clear abuse of discretion exists when a trial court's ruling is arbitrary and unreasonable or made without regard to guiding legal principles or supporting evidence, and appellate-remedy adequacy is evaluated by balancing the benefits and detriments of mandamus review.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Trujillo established entitlement to mandamus relief by showing a clear abuse of discretion and the absence of an adequate remedy by appeal.

Disposition

writ_denied

Cases Cited (7)

  • In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(cited)
  • In re Christus Santa Rosa Health Sys., 492 S.W.3d 276, 279 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding)(cited)
  • Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)(cited)
  • In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am., 494 S.W.3d 708, 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding)(cited)
  • Ford Motor Co. v. Garcia, 363 S.W.3d 573, 578 (Tex. 2012)(cited)
  • In re Essex Ins. Co., 450 S.W.3d 524, 528 (Tex. 2014) (orig. proceeding)(cited)
  • In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…