Summary
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas reviewed the State’s appeal from an order suppressing evidence obtained during a vehicle search. The court held that the driver’s consent to search the truck reasonably extended to a suitcase in the truck bed, reversed the trial court’s judgment, and rendered judgment denying the motion to suppress.
Holdings
- Where the driver gave consent to search the vehicle and did not reasonably convey that a particular container belonged to another occupant, it was objectively reasonable for the officer to understand the consent as extending to the suitcase found in the truck bed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the driver's voluntary consent to search the pickup truck extended to a suitcase located in the truck bed.
- Whether Tumlinson's absence from the vehicle and inability to object to the search prevented the driver's consent from authorizing the search of the suitcase.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (16)
- Lerma v. State, 543 S.W.3d 184, 189–90 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018)(followed)
- Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85, 88–89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)(followed)
- State v. Ross, 32 S.W.3d 853, 855 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000)(followed)
- Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 327 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000)(followed)
- State v. Rodriguez, 521 S.W.3d 1, 8, 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017)(followed)
- Valtierra v. State, 310 S.W.3d 442, 447–49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010)(followed)
- Kothe v. State, 152 S.W.3d 54, 62–63 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004)(followed)
- McGee v. State, 105 S.W.3d 609, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)(followed)
- Miles v. State, 241 S.W.3d 28, 35 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)(followed)
- Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248, 249 (1991)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…