The State of Texas v. Christopher Tumlinson

No. 13-19-00603-CR · Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi–Edinburg · July 29, 2021 · No. 13-19-00603-CR

Summary

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas reviewed the State’s appeal from an order suppressing evidence obtained during a vehicle search. The court held that the driver’s consent to search the truck reasonably extended to a suitcase in the truck bed, reversed the trial court’s judgment, and rendered judgment denying the motion to suppress.

Holdings

  1. Where the driver gave consent to search the vehicle and did not reasonably convey that a particular container belonged to another occupant, it was objectively reasonable for the officer to understand the consent as extending to the suitcase found in the truck bed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the driver's voluntary consent to search the pickup truck extended to a suitcase located in the truck bed.
  2. Whether Tumlinson's absence from the vehicle and inability to object to the search prevented the driver's consent from authorizing the search of the suitcase.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (16)

  • Lerma v. State, 543 S.W.3d 184, 189–90 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018)(followed)
  • Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85, 88–89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)(followed)
  • State v. Ross, 32 S.W.3d 853, 855 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000)(followed)
  • Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 327 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000)(followed)
  • State v. Rodriguez, 521 S.W.3d 1, 8, 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017)(followed)
  • Valtierra v. State, 310 S.W.3d 442, 447–49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010)(followed)
  • Kothe v. State, 152 S.W.3d 54, 62–63 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004)(followed)
  • McGee v. State, 105 S.W.3d 609, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)(followed)
  • Miles v. State, 241 S.W.3d 28, 35 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)(followed)
  • Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248, 249 (1991)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…