Summary
The Texas Thirteenth Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial court judgment reducing Andrew Smith's sentence for indecency with a child by sexual contact from fourteen years to three years. The court held that the trial court improperly modified the sentence without conducting a new punishment hearing and orally pronouncing the sentence in the presence of the parties.
Holdings
- The State did not waive its right to appeal by failing to make a separate objection to the trial court's grant of Smith's motion because the State opposed the motion in a written response and was statutorily authorized to appeal the order.
- A trial court may not validly modify a felony sentence without holding a new punishment hearing in open court and orally pronouncing the modified sentence in the presence of the defendant and the State.
- The three-year sentencing judgment was invalid because the trial court lacked authority to modify the sentence without the required statutory procedure; the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for proper assessment of punishment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the State waived its right to appeal because it did not specifically object to the trial court's grant of Smith's motion to reconsider sentence.
- Whether the trial court properly modified Smith's felony sentence without conducting a new punishment hearing and orally pronouncing the modified sentence in the presence of the parties.
- Whether the trial court's three-year sentence was valid or whether the judgment had to be reversed and remanded for proper assessment of punishment.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (6)
- State v. Moore, 225 S.W.3d 556, 557 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)(distinguished)
- Vidaurri v. State, 49 S.W.3d 880, 885–86 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)(distinguished)
- State v. Davis, 349 S.W.3d 535, 536, 538–40 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011)(followed)
- State v. Aguilera, 165 S.W.3d 695, 697–98 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(followed)
- McClinton v. State, 121 S.W.3d 768, 770–71 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (Cochran, J., concurring) (per curiam)(followed)
- Duran v. State, No. 04-11-00812-CR, 2012 WL 3834674, at *3–4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 5, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…