Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal held that a decedent's homestead property lost its homestead character when the will directed the personal representative to sell the property and place the proceeds into the estate residue. The proceeds were therefore subject to the claim of a health care provider. The court affirmed and certified a question of great public importance concerning protection of homestead-sale proceeds under Article X, section 4(b) of the Florida Constitution.
Holdings
- When a testator's will specifically directs that homestead property be sold and that the proceeds be placed in the estate residue for distribution with other assets, the property loses its homestead character and becomes subject to the claims of creditors.
Questions Presented
- Whether a decedent's homestead loses its homestead character and becomes subject to creditors' claims when the will directs the personal representative to sell the property and place the proceeds into the estate residue for distribution to adult children.
- Whether article X, section 4(b) of the Florida Constitution protects the proceeds of a homestead sale under those circumstances.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- In re Estate of Price v. West Florida Hosp., Inc., 513 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 1st DCA), cause dismissed, 518 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1987)(followed)
- Elmowitz v. Estate of Zimmerman, 647 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(followed)
- In re Estate of Tudhope, 595 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)(distinguished)
- Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Lopez, Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Lopez, 531 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1988)(followed)
- Hubert v. Hubert, 622 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), rev. denied, 634 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1994)(followed)
- Bartelt v. Bartelt, 579 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…