Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed Anthony Malachi McInnis’s judgment and sentence for first-degree murder and theft. On rehearing, the court substituted a clarified opinion and held that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of premeditation, including the defendant’s statements, the crime-scene evidence, blood-spatter evidence, and bullet trajectories. The court rejected the remaining appellate challenges concerning the jury instruction and the State’s closing arguments.
Holdings
- Trial court did not err in denying motion for judgment of acquittal because competent, substantial evidence supported finding of premeditation.
Questions Presented
- Whether trial court erred in denying motion for judgment of acquittal on first-degree murder charge
- Whether trial court erred in instructing jury on aggressor portion of standard jury instruction for justifiable use of deadly force
- Whether trial court erred in overruling objection to State's comments during closing arguments
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- Bradwell v. State, 300 So. 3d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)(followed)
- Walker v. State, 957 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 2007)(followed)
- Taylor v. State, 316 So. 3d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)(followed)
- Twilegar v. State, 42 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 2010)(followed)
- McMillian v. State, 94 So. 3d 572 (Fla. 2012)(followed)
- Asay v. State, 580 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 1991)(followed)
- Beasley v. State, 774 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 2000)(followed)
- McInnis v. State, No. 1D23-2714, 2025 WL 699793 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 5, 2025)(replaced_by_subsequent_opinion)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…