Summary
In Varano v. Varano, the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment, holding that a life tenant who lacked authority to sell the property could not convey a fee simple interest and was not entitled to escrowed sale proceeds. The court emphasized that a life tenant owes a quasi-trustee duty to remaindermen and cannot unilaterally sell the property without a Lady Bird Deed or joinder of remaindermen. Additionally, the widow’s role as trustee of a remainder trust created a conflict of interest, rendering the sale voidable under Florida Statutes § 736.0802.
Holdings
- A life tenant cannot convey an interest greater than what she owns; she cannot sell a fee simple interest and is not entitled to the proceeds of such a sale. The life tenant's interest is limited to the life estate, and she cannot force a sale on the remaindermen.
- Even assuming the widow was trustee, she lacked authority to bind the trust because the sale presented a conflict of interest; a trustee must administer the trust solely in the interests of beneficiaries, and a transaction affected by a conflict is voidable unless approved by court or consented to by beneficiary.
Questions Presented
- Whether a life tenant is entitled to proceeds from the sale of a fee simple interest in property when the deed does not authorize such sale.
- Whether the widow, as trustee of a remainder trust, had authority to bind the trust to a sale that created a conflict of interest.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Volusia Cnty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000)(applied)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)(applied)
- Chapman v. Chapman, 526 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)(applied)
- Hirschenson v. Compu-Link Corp. of MI, 389 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)(applied)
- Smith v. Smith, 600 S.W.2d 666 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980)(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.