Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal held that a personal representative may not contest provisions of the will under which the representative was appointed and must resign upon filing such a challenge. The court further held that the surviving widow, in her individual capacity as beneficiary of a charitable remainder unitrust, had a pecuniary interest sufficient to contest a remainder devise because invalidation would increase the residuary trust. The court reversed and remanded with instructions to amend the petition and address the widow’s resignation as personal representative.
Holdings
- A personal representative has no standing to contest the will under which the personal representative holds the appointment and disqualifies herself from continuing to serve in that capacity by filing suit contesting any part of that will.
- The surviving widow had standing in her individual capacity because successfully avoiding the remainder devise would cause the property interest to fall into the residue, thereby increasing the corpus of the charitable remainder unitrust from which she received annual distributions.
Questions Presented
- Whether a personal representative may contest provisions of the same will under which the personal representative holds the appointment.
- Whether the surviving widow, acting in her individual capacity as a beneficiary of the residuary charitable remainder unitrust, had standing to contest a remainder devise to Dr. Rosch.
- Whether the petition could be amended to reflect the widow's individual beneficial interest and whether she had to resign as personal representative before pursuing the contest.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (12)
- Baker v. Baker, 266 Ala. 210, 95 So. 2d 101 (1957)(followed)
- In re Barret's Estate, 40 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1949)(distinguished)
- Charles Barnett v. William R. Barnett, Barnett v. Barnett, 340 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)(distinguished)
- In re Pfeiffer's Will, 34 Fla. Supp. 132 (Dade County 1970), aff'd without opinion, 240 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)(followed)
- Reed v. Home National Bank, 297 Mass. 222, 8 N.E.2d 601 (1937)(followed)
- In re Estate of Meredith, 275 Mich. 278, 266 N.W. 351 (1936)(followed)
- In re Estate of O'Brien, 126 P.2d 47 (Wash. 1942)(followed)
- Stewart's Estate Hemstad v. Ferry, 107 Iowa 117, 77 N.W. 574 (1898)(followed)
- Jay v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 10 Cal. App. 3d 754, 89 Cal. Rptr. 466 (1970)(followed)
- In re Estate of Parsons, 65 Cal. 240, 3 P. 817 (1884)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.