Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed an order striking the defendants' pleadings and entering a default as a discovery sanction. The majority held that the trial court abused its discretion by imposing the sanctions without a noticed hearing and without findings of deliberate and contumacious disregard or willful failure to comply with discovery; a dissent would have affirmed.
Holdings
- The trial court abused its discretion by imposing the sanctions without holding a noticed hearing.
- The trial court abused its discretion because it failed to make the requisite finding that the defendants' conduct demonstrated a deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court's authority or a willful failure to submit to discovery.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by striking the defendants' pleadings and entering a default as discovery sanctions without first holding a noticed hearing.
- Whether such severe discovery sanctions required an express finding that the defendants acted with a deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court's authority or willfully failed to comply with discovery.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (8)
- Mercer v. Raine, Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1983)(followed)
- Donner v. Smith, 517 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)(followed)
- Championship Wrestling From Florida, Inc. v. DeBlasio, 508 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 518 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1987)(followed)
- Trupei v. City of Lighthouse Point, 506 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)(followed)
- Stoner v. Verkaden, 493 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)(followed)
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)(discussed)
- Ferrante v. Waters, 383 So. 2d 749, 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)(distinguished_from)
- Luca v. Largo Diversified, Inc., 396 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)(distinguished_from)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…