Summary
When a trial court bifurcates a dissolution proceeding by entering a final judgment dissolving the marriage but retains jurisdiction to determine property issues, the subsequent death of a party does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to resolve those reserved issues. The appellate court reversed the dismissal of the former wife’s claims, holding that the trial court retained jurisdiction despite the former husband’s death and the opening of a probate estate.
Holdings
- When a trial court bifurcates a dissolution proceeding by entering a final judgment dissolving the marriage but retains jurisdiction to determine property issues, the subsequent death of a party does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to determine the reserved issues.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the Former Wife's claims for determination of property issues in a bifurcated dissolution proceeding following the Former Husband's death
- Whether the death of a party after entry of a final judgment dissolving the marriage but reserving property issues deprives the dissolution court of jurisdiction
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- Fernandez v. Fernandez, 648 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1995)(applied)
- Geisler v. Geisler, 397 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…