Kyle Matthew Hill v. State of Florida

Hill · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District · March 18, 2026 · No. 2D2025-1955

Summary

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal denied Kyle Matthew Hill’s petition for a writ of certiorari challenging an order permitting the State to subpoena his medical records. The court held that the competency issue did not bar the discovery hearing because Hill had not been adjudicated incompetent and the hearing was not a material stage of the criminal proceeding. The court also concluded that the State established a sufficient nexus between the requested records and its theory that Hill was intoxicated when the crash occurred.

Holdings

  1. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(a) did not bar the subpoena proceedings because Hill had not been adjudicated incompetent; a single confidential expert evaluation was insufficient to constitute the competency determination required by the governing statute and rules.
  2. The hearing concerning the State's medical-records subpoenas was not a material stage of the criminal proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(a)(1).
  3. The State established the required nexus and compelling need for Hill's medical records by presenting a reasonable theory that Hill was intoxicated when the crash occurred and evidence, including the charging documents, accident circumstances, and reported blood-alcohol concentration, making it reasonable to expect the records to contain supporting evidence.
  4. Certiorari relief was not warranted because the circuit court's order did not depart from the essential requirements of law.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the circuit court was barred from conducting the medical-records subpoena hearing because Hill's competency to proceed was in doubt.
  2. Whether the hearing on the State's subpoenas was a material stage of the criminal proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(a).
  3. Whether the State established the required nexus between Hill's medical records and a material issue in the criminal case.
  4. Whether the circuit court's order departed from the essential requirements of law so as to warrant certiorari relief.

Disposition

writ_denied

Cases Cited (18)

  • Hunter v. State, 639 So. 2d 72, 74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)(followed)
  • Walter v. Page, 638 So. 2d 1030, 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)(applied)
  • American Prime Title Services, LLC v. Wang, 317 So. 3d 1183, 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)(applied)
  • Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. American Educational Enterprises, LLC, 99 So. 3d 450, 454-55 (Fla. 2012)(applied)
  • Hett v. Barron-Lunde, 290 So. 3d 565, 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)(applied)
  • Plantz v. John, 170 So. 3d 822, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)(applied)
  • Foster v. State, 326 So. 3d 1192, 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)(applied)
  • Gomillion v. State, 267 So. 3d 502, 506, 508-09 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)(followed)
  • Paylan v. Fitzgerald, 223 So. 3d 431, 434 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)(followed)
  • Allstate Insurance v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885, 889 (Fla. 2003)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…