Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a final judgment declaring unconstitutional a City of Miami ordinance that moved municipal elections from odd-numbered to even-numbered years, effectively canceling the November 2025 election and extending certain officials’ terms. The court held that the ordinance effectively amended the City Charter and therefore required voter approval by referendum under the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter and the Florida Constitution. The court further concluded that the general-law statutes relied upon by the City were permissive and did not supersede the referendum requirement.
Holdings
- An ordinance that changes the existing terms of a municipal charter is an amendment to that charter. Because the ordinance made it impossible to comply with the City Charter's election-date and term-limit provisions, it effectively amended or repealed those provisions.
- The permissive general-law statutes relied upon by the City did not supersede the City's governing charters or the Florida Constitution. The statutes used the term "may" and did not require the City to change its election dates or extend terms in conflict with the charters.
- The City may not enact an ordinance that effectively amends its Charter without submitting the issue to the electorate by referendum. The ordinance was unconstitutional because it violated the exclusive charter-amendment method established under the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter and authorized by the Florida Constitution.
Questions Presented
- Whether the City's ordinance effectively amended or repealed provisions of the City Charter establishing municipal election dates and term limits.
- Whether Florida general-law statutes authorizing municipalities to change election dates permitted the City to enact the ordinance without complying with the City and Miami-Dade County Charters.
- Whether the Florida Constitution's Miami-Dade County Home Rule Amendment made referendum the exclusive method for amending the City Charter.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (31)
- Gray v. Golden, 89 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 1956)(followed)
- Metropolitan Dade County v. City of Miami, 396 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1980)(followed)
- Ibarra v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc., 350 So. 3d 465, 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)(followed)
- Orozco v. McCormick 105, LLC, 276 So. 3d 932, 935 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)(followed)
- Lam v. Univision Communications, Inc., 329 So. 3d 190, 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)(followed)
- Edward A. Schilling v. Maria Herrera, Schilling v. Herrera, 952 So. 2d 1231, 1234 (Fla. 2007)(followed)
- Telli v. Broward County, 94 So. 3d 504, 505 n.1 (Fla. 2012)(followed)
- Raffay v. Longwood House Condominium Ass'n, Inc., 389 So. 3d 589, 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)(followed)
- State v. City of Weston, 316 So. 3d 398, 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)(followed)
- Rosier v. State, 276 So. 3d 403, 406 (Fla. 2019)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 31.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.