Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal dismissed a petition for writ of certiorari as premature. The court determined that the trial court had overruled the petitioners' discovery objections except as to materials claimed to be protected by attorney-client and work-product privileges, and that the privilege log required for an in-camera review had apparently been filed but had not yet been ruled upon.
Holdings
- A petition for writ of certiorari challenging discovery materials identified in a privilege log is premature until the trial court rules on the privilege issues raised by the log.
Questions Presented
- Whether a petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of discovery and privilege issues was premature before the trial court ruled on the privilege log.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Lin Castre Gosman v. Joseph J. Luzinski, as Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Abraham David Gosman, Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293, 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(followed)
- Dade Truss Co. v. Beaty, 271 So. 3d 59, 65 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)(followed)
- Tedrow v. Cannon, 186 So. 3d 43, 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…