F.E.O., the Mother v. Department of Children and Families, et al.

No. 3D24-1609 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 2, 2025) · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District · April 2, 2025 · No. No. 3D24-1609

Summary

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's denial of the mother's motion to set aside a final judgment terminating her parental rights. The court held that the parent's failure to appear at the adjudicatory hearing, after appearing at the advisory hearing and receiving notice, constituted consent under section 39.801(3)(e), Florida Statutes (2024).

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Chief Judge Logue; Judge Emas; Judge Scales
Jurisdiction
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Decision date
April 2, 2025
Docket number
No. 3D24-1609
Procedural posture
Appeal from a termination-of-parental-rights proceeding in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, including the denial of the mother's motion to set aside and vacate the final judgment of termination of parental rights.
Standard of review
Abuse of discretion.
Precedential value
Published opinion
Parties
F.E.O., the Mother v. Department of Children and Families, Guardian ad Litem
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

termination of parental rightsparental rightsfamily law procedureappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

family lawtermination of parental rightsappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the circuit court abused its discretion in denying the mother's motion to set aside and vacate the final judgment terminating her parental rights.
  2. Whether the mother's failure to appear at the adjudicatory hearing constituted consent to termination under section 39.801(3)(e), Florida Statutes.

Holdings

  1. The circuit court did not abuse its discretion in denying the mother's motion to set aside and vacate the final judgment terminating her parental rights.

Key quotations

If a parent appears for the advisory hearing and the court orders that parent to appear at the adjudicatory hearing for the petition for termination of parental rights, stating the date, time, and location of the hearing and, if applicable, instructions for appearance through audio-video communication technology, then failure of that parent to appear, either physically or, by agreement of the parties or at the discretion of the court, through audio-video communication technology, at the adjudicatory hearing constitutes consent for termination of parental rights.
Discretion, in this sense, is abused when the judicial action is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, which is another way of saying that discretion is abused only where no reasonable [person] would take the view adopted by the trial court. If reasonable [people] could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court, then it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion. (1203)

Factual background

The proceeding concerned termination of the mother's parental rights. The opinion applied section 39.801(3)(e), which provides that a parent's failure to appear at the adjudicatory hearing after appearing at the advisory hearing and being ordered to appear constitutes consent to termination. The mother challenged the resulting termination judgment through a motion to set aside and vacate.

Procedural history

The circuit court entered a final judgment terminating the mother's parental rights after she failed to appear at the adjudicatory hearing. The mother sought to set aside and vacate the judgment, and the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's disposition.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…