Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal denied Horkene Terrell Cade’s petition for a writ of mandamus. The court held that mandamus relief was unavailable because the trial court had already entered a written order denying Cade’s motion to correct an illegal sentence.
Holdings
- Mandamus must be denied because the trial court had already entered a written order denying the motion, leaving no action for the appellate court to compel.
Questions Presented
- Whether mandamus should issue to compel the trial court to enter a written order when the trial court had already entered an order denying the underlying motion.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (3)
- State v. McRae, 38 So. 605, 606 (Fla. 1905)(followed)
- State ex rel. Knott v. Haskell, 72 So. 651, 659 (Fla. 1916)(followed)
- State ex rel. Buckwalter v. City of Lakeland, 150 So. 508, 511 (Fla. 1933)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…