Horkene Terrell Cade v. State of Florida

No. 3D25-2339 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District · December 17, 2025 · No. No. 3D25-2339

Summary

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal denied Horkene Terrell Cade’s petition for a writ of mandamus. The court held that mandamus relief was unavailable because the trial court had already entered a written order denying Cade’s motion to correct an illegal sentence.

Holdings

  1. Mandamus must be denied because the trial court had already entered a written order denying the motion, leaving no action for the appellate court to compel.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether mandamus should issue to compel the trial court to enter a written order when the trial court had already entered an order denying the underlying motion.

Disposition

writ_denied

Cases Cited (3)

  • State v. McRae, 38 So. 605, 606 (Fla. 1905)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Knott v. Haskell, 72 So. 651, 659 (Fla. 1916)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Buckwalter v. City of Lakeland, 150 So. 508, 511 (Fla. 1933)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…