Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal denied Richard Harper’s petition for second-tier certiorari review of a circuit court decision upholding a code-enforcement fine concerning an allegedly expired building permit. The court held that Harper failed to show a departure from the essential requirements of law under the limited scope of second-tier certiorari review. The court also concluded that the circuit court’s “all writs” authority did not independently support relief.
Holdings
- The petition for second-tier certiorari was denied because Harper did not establish that the circuit court failed to afford procedural due process or departed from the essential requirements of law.
- The circuit court's all-writs authority was not an independent basis for granting Harper relief; because Harper identified no independent constitutional or legal basis allowing the circuit court to exercise that authority, the denial of his petition was not legal error.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law or failed to afford procedural due process when it upheld the Special Magistrate's Code Enforcement Final Order Imposing Fine.
- Whether the circuit court could grant Harper relief under its constitutional all-writs authority absent an independent basis for exercising that authority.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (5)
- Harper v. City of Key Colony Beach, 394 So. 3d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)(followed)
- Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So. 3d 1086, 1092 (Fla. 2010)(followed)
- Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523, 530 (Fla. 1995)(followed)
- Williams v. State, 913 So. 2d 541, 543-44 (Fla. 2005)(followed)
- St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So. 2d 1304, 1305 (Fla. 1980)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…