Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in Jonathan E. Rivera-Enriquez’s criminal appeal. The court addressed permissive lesser-included-offense instructions, amendment of a charging information, reliability of out-of-court statements, and abuse-of-discretion review.
Holdings
- The Third District affirmed the judgment because the record did not establish reversible error or an abuse of discretion in the challenged trial-court rulings.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion in rulings concerning a permissive lesser-included-offense instruction.
- Whether any midtrial substantive amendment of the information prejudiced the defendant's substantial rights.
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining that out-of-court statements bore sufficient indicia of reliability.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- State v. Espinosa, 686 So. 2d 1345, 1347 (Fla. 1996)(applied)
- Thach v. State, 342 So. 3d 620, 623–24 (Fla. 2022)(applied)
- Perez v. State, 536 So. 2d 206, 210 (Fla. 1988)(applied)
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…