Summary
The court reverses an order awarding permanent total disability benefits in a workers’ compensation case. Although the Judge of Compensation Claims applied the appropriate standards and supported the benefits award with record evidence, the court held that the Employer was improperly denied the opportunity to depose and examine a treating physician whose opinions were critical to disputed factual issues. The case was remanded for additional proceedings.
Holdings
- The JCC did not commit error in awarding PTD benefits and used the appropriate legal standards in determining Claimant's entitlement.
- The JCC abused its discretion by denying the Employer the opportunity to depose Claimant's authorized treating physician, whose opinions were critical to the factual issues in dispute, thereby preventing the case from being decided on its merits.
Questions Presented
- Whether the JCC erred in awarding permanent total disability benefits to the Claimant under the applicable statutory standards.
- Whether the JCC erred by denying the Employer the opportunity to depose Claimant's authorized treating physician and by denying a continuance or permission to submit post-hearing evidence.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (5)
- Burgess v. Buckhead Beef Fla., 15 So.3d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)(followed)
- Hernandez v. Paris Indus. Maint., 39 So.3d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)(followed)
- Witham v. Sheehan Pipeline Constr. Co., 45 So.3d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)(followed)
- Steel Dynamics Inc.-New Millennium v. Markham, 46 So.3d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)(followed)
- White v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LP, 16 So.3d 992 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…