Summary
The District Court of Guam granted in part and denied in part the Government of Guam’s Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss claims brought by Kristoffer Castro. The court held that sovereign immunity did not bar Castro’s Title VII retaliation and race-discrimination claims, but it dismissed his intentional infliction of emotional distress claim because Guam had not waived immunity for intentional torts. The court granted Castro 30 days to amend his complaint to clarify the discrimination claim and replace the intentional tort claim with negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Holdings
- Congress abrogated state and territorial sovereign immunity for Title VII employment-discrimination claims through the 1972 amendments, so Guam's lack of a local waiver did not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction over Castro's retaliation claim.
- The court had subject matter jurisdiction over Castro's race-discrimination claim because the complaint, read as a whole, alleged employment discrimination under Title VII, which abrogates Guam's sovereign immunity.
- Guam's sovereign immunity barred Castro's intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress claim because neither federal law nor Guam law waived or abrogated immunity for intentional torts.
- Leave to amend was warranted because there was no undue delay, bad faith, repeated failure to cure, or undue prejudice, and amendment was not futile.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court had subject matter jurisdiction over Castro's Title VII retaliation claim despite Guam's sovereign immunity.
- Whether the court had subject matter jurisdiction over Castro's race-discrimination claim under Title VII despite Guam's sovereign immunity.
- Whether Guam's sovereign immunity barred Castro's intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress claim.
- Whether Castro should receive leave to amend the complaint to clarify his race-discrimination claim and replace the intentional tort claim with negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (20)
- J.P. v. United States, 679 F.Supp.3d 911, 920 (D. Ariz. 2023)(followed)
- Gabrielli v. Haleon US Inc., 815 F.Supp.3d 852, 862 (N.D. Cal. 2025)(followed)
- Friends of the River v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 870 F.Supp.2d 966, 972 (E.D. Cal. 2012)(followed)
- Savage v. Glendale Union High Sch., 343 F.3d 1036, 1039 n.2 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Ellis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 950 F.Supp.2d 1062, 1072 (N.D. Cal. 2013)(followed)
- Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Lauria v. United States, 542 F.Supp.3d 926, 931 (D. Alaska 2021)(followed)
- San Agustin v. Mansapit-Shimizu, 2020 Guam 25, ¶ 14 (2020)(followed)
- Micomonaco v. State of Wash., 45 F.3d 316, 319 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Hans v. Louisianna, 134 U.S. 1 (1890)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…