Summary
The Eighth Circuit held that a transfer of property by a prisoner to a law enforcement officer in custody violates public policy, reversing the district court’s judgment on the wrongful-dominion diversity claim and remanding for further proceedings. The court also upheld the denial of discovery sanctions against an officer, finding no abuse of discretion. The opinion addresses unconstitutional jail conditions, alleged excessive force, and the validity of property transfers made by prisoners to custodial officials.
Holdings
- Under Missouri law, a transfer of property by a prisoner in the custody of a law-enforcement officer to that officer violates public policy.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying sanctions against Hensley based on its finding of personal difficulties underlying his noncompliance with the discovery order.
Questions Presented
- Whether, under Missouri law, a transfer of property by a prisoner in the custody of a law-enforcement officer to that officer violates public policy.
- Whether the district court abused its discretion by refusing to impose discovery sanctions against Hensley for failure to comply with a discovery order.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (6)
- Stratioti v. Bick, 704 F.2d 1052, 1054 (8th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Nelson by Wharton v. Missouri Department of Family Services, 706 F.2d 276, 278 (8th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Red Lobster Inns of America, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp., 656 F.2d 381, 387 (8th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- Phil Crowley Steel Corp. v. Macomber, Inc., 601 F.2d 342, 344 (8th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Voegeli v. Lewis, 568 F.2d 89, 96 (8th Cir. 1977)(followed)
- Fox v. Studebaker-Worthington, Inc., 516 F.2d 989, 993 (8th Cir. 1975)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…