Summary
The Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court judgment affirming the denial of Carolyn Nimick's application for Social Security disability benefits. The court held that the administrative law judge failed to develop and make explicit findings concerning the physical and mental demands of Nimick's past relevant work as a machine operator and whether her residual functional capacity permitted her to perform that work.
Holdings
- The ALJ may find that a claimant can perform past relevant work only after fully developing the physical and mental demands of that work and making explicit findings comparing those demands with the claimant's residual functional capacity. The record did not support the ALJ's finding that Nimick could perform her past work as a machine operator.
- The case must be remanded to the ALJ for specific factual findings concerning the physical and mental demands of the job the ALJ considers the claimant capable of performing, including stress, technical or complex requirements, dust and fumes, and physical demands.
- If Nimick had no past relevant work or could not perform it but could perform light work, the burden would shift to the Secretary to show that she could perform work existing in the national economy; a vocational expert would then be required under the applicable regulations and circuit precedent.
Questions Presented
- Whether substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that Nimick could perform her past relevant work as a machine operator.
- Whether the ALJ was required to make specific findings concerning the physical and mental demands of the past relevant work and compare those demands with Nimick's residual functional capacity.
- Whether the case should be remanded for further proceedings because the record did not adequately establish the demands of the past work or address the combined effects of Nimick's impairments.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (3)
- Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 470-71, 106 S. Ct. 2022, 2024-25, 90 L. Ed. 2d 462 (1986)(followed)
- Jelinek v. Heckler, 764 F.2d 507, 511 (8th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Jelinek v. Bowen, 870 F.2d 457, 459 (8th Cir. 1989)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…