Christopher C. Kluesner v. Michael J. Astrue

Kluesner v. Astrue, 607 F.3d 533 (8th Cir. 2010) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · June 10, 2010 · No. No. 09-2831

Summary

The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment upholding the denial of Christopher Kluesner's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The court held that substantial evidence supported the administrative law judge's determination that Kluesner's marijuana abuse was a contributing factor material to his disability, despite the abuse being in remission at the time of the hearing. The court also rejected Kluesner's challenges to the evaluation of his testimony and the medical evidence.

Holdings

  1. Substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that Kluesner's marijuana abuse was a contributing factor material to his disability, because the medical evidence showed that marijuana aggravated his mental conditions and materially contributed to his dysfunction, while abstinence would have enabled him to return to work within the stated limitations.
  2. A claimant's substance abuse being in remission at the time of the hearing does not preclude a finding that substance abuse was a contributing factor material to disability during the relevant period.
  3. The ALJ did not act inconsistently by first finding Kluesner disabled regardless of cause and then finding that substance abuse was material to that disability.
  4. The ALJ did not improperly reject Kluesner's testimony regarding cessation of marijuana use; the ALJ accepted that his substance abuse was in remission and nevertheless properly evaluated materiality over the relevant period.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that Kluesner's marijuana abuse was a contributing factor material to his disability.
  2. Whether the ALJ's finding that Kluesner's substance abuse was in remission at the hearing was inconsistent with finding that substance abuse was material during the relevant disability period.
  3. Whether the ALJ improperly evaluated Kluesner's testimony that he had stopped using marijuana.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (7)

  • Bowman v. Barnhart, 310 F.3d 1080, 1083 (8th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Finch v. Astrue, 547 F.3d 933, 935 (8th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-42, 107 S. Ct. 2287, 96 L. Ed. 2d 119 (1987)(followed)
  • Robson v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 389, 392 (8th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Estes v. Barnhart, 275 F.3d 722, 725 (8th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 693-95 (8th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Vester v. Barnhart, 416 F.3d 886, 890 (8th Cir. 2005)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…