Maria Garcia-Mata v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III

Maria Garcia-Mata v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, 893 F.3d 1107 · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · June 29, 2018 · No. No. 17-1682

Summary

The Eighth Circuit granted a petition for review of a BIA decision that vacated an immigration judge's grant of withholding of removal. The court held that the BIA's opinion was too opaque to determine whether it applied the correct standard of review—clear error for factual findings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(i)—or engaged in impermissible factfinding. The case was remanded for the BIA to clarify its reasoning or apply the proper standard. Key topics: BIA standard of review, clear error, factual findings, withholding of removal, remand for clarification.

Holdings

  1. The Board's opinion is insufficiently clear to determine whether it applied the correct standard of review, so remand is required.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Board of Immigration Appeals applied the correct standard of review to the immigration judge's factual findings when it vacated the withholding of removal order.

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (11)

  • Waldron v. Holder, 688 F.3d 354 (8th Cir. 2012)(cited)
  • Ramirez-Peyro v. Gonzales, 477 F.3d 637 (8th Cir. 2007)(cited)
  • Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199 (1974)(cited)
  • Suciu v. INS, 755 F.2d 127 (8th Cir. 1985)(cited)
  • Singh v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 461 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2006)(cited)
  • Singh v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 553 (8th Cir. 2007)(cited)
  • SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194 (1947)(cited)
  • Nabulwala v. Gonzales, 481 F.3d 1115 (8th Cir. 2007)(cited)
  • In re R-S-H, 23 I. & N. Dec. 629 (BIA 2003)(cited)
  • INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12 (2002)(cited)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…