Summary
The Eleventh Circuit granted Ricoh Corporation's petition for a writ of mandamus and directed the Northern District of Alabama to transfer the contract dispute to the Southern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The court held that, when a valid and reasonable forum-selection clause exists, the party opposing transfer bears the burden of showing that the contractual forum is sufficiently inconvenient, and that the district court had clearly abused its discretion by denying transfer.
Holdings
- When a § 1404(a) motion seeks to enforce a valid and reasonable forum-selection clause, the party opposing transfer bears the burden of persuading the court that the contractual forum is sufficiently inconvenient to justify retaining the dispute.
- The district court clearly abused its discretion by refusing to transfer the action to the contractually selected Manhattan forum.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court clearly abused its discretion under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) by refusing to transfer the action to the contractually selected forum in Manhattan.
- Whether, when a valid and reasonable forum-selection clause is invoked, the party opposing transfer bears the burden of showing that the contractual forum is sufficiently inconvenient to justify retaining the case.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (7)
- The Stewart Org., Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 779 F.2d 643 (11th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- The Stewart Org., Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 810 F.2d 1066 (11th Cir. 1987) (en banc)(followed)
- Stewart Org., Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 108 S. Ct. 2239, 101 L. Ed. 2d 22 (1988)(followed)
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 508 (1947)(distinguished)
- Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965)(described)
- Roofing & Sheet Metal Servs., Inc. v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., 689 F.2d 982, 987 (11th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- United States v. Fernandez-Toledo, 737 F.2d 912, 919 (11th Cir. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…