In re R. Wayne Johnson

2021-107 · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · February 2, 2021 · No. 21-107

Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied R. Wayne Johnson’s petition for a writ of mandamus challenging proceedings in the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. The court held that Johnson had not shown entitlement to mandamus and construed his filing as a timely notice of appeal, transmitting it to the Veterans Court for docketing.

Holdings

  1. Mandamus relief was unavailable because Johnson had an adequate alternative remedy by directly appealing a final decision of the Veterans Court and therefore did not establish a clear and indisputable right to relief.
  2. The filing was construed as a notice of appeal and transmitted to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims because it appeared to satisfy Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c)(1) and was timely to appeal from the Veterans Court's judgment.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Johnson was entitled to a writ of mandamus from the Federal Circuit despite having a direct appeal available from a final decision of the Veterans Court.
  2. Whether Johnson's filing should be construed and transmitted as a notice of appeal when it satisfied Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c)(1) and was timely under the applicable appeal rules.

Disposition

writ_denied

Cases Cited (2)

  • Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989)(followed)
  • In re Pollitz, 206 U.S. 323, 331 (1907)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…