Summary
**Crews v. McDonough, 2023, Fed. Cir.** **Topics:** Veterans benefits; substitution of surviving spouse under 38 U.S.C. § 5121A; clear and unmistakable error (CUE); pending claim. **Holding:** The Federal Circuit affirmed the Veterans Court, holding that a surviving spouse cannot be substituted under § 5121A to raise a CUE claim that the deceased veteran never raised before death. The statute permits substitution only on a claim that was pending at the veteran's death; a CUE allegation challenging a prior final decision not previously contested by the veteran constitutes a new claim, not a theory of entitlement within a pending claim.
Holdings
- Section 5121A only allows a survivor to substitute as a claimant for a previously raised CUE claim; it does not allow a survivor to bring a CUE claim that was not previously raised.
Questions Presented
- Whether a surviving spouse may be substituted under 38 U.S.C. § 5121A to raise a claim of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) that the deceased veteran had not raised before death.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Phillips v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236 (Fed. Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Padgett v. Nicholson, 473 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2007)(acknowledged)
- Rusick v. Gibson, 760 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Haines v. West, 154 F.3d 1298 (Fed. Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Bazalo v. West, 150 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1998)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.