State of Florida v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary, Health, Education and Welfare

492 F.2d 488 (5th Cir. 1974) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · April 10, 1974 · No. No. 73-1728

Summary

The Fifth Circuit held that Florida's challenge to a federal regulation governing the composition of state nursing home administrator licensing boards under Medicaid was ripe for judicial review. The court also held that Florida had standing, found standing for certain additional plaintiffs but not others, rejected the sovereign-immunity argument at that stage, and reversed and remanded without reaching the merits of the regulation's validity.

Holdings

  1. The controversy was ripe for judicial review because the Secretary had adopted a final regulation that was formally and actually in effect, directly conflicted with Florida law, required immediate compliance if valid, and exposed Florida to serious sanctions including termination of Medicaid funding.
  2. The State of Florida had standing to litigate the validity of the Secretary's regulation.
  3. The non-state plaintiffs had standing only if they alleged a nonconjectural injury in fact to an interest arguably within the statute's zone of interests; applying that standard, all non-state plaintiffs except Mary R. Tracy, William R. Stinger, M.D., the Florida Nursing Home Association, and the American Nursing Home Association had standing on the pleadings.
  4. The sovereign-immunity defense did not require dismissal at this stage because the complaint alleged that the Secretary acted beyond his delegated powers.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Florida's challenge to the Secretary's Medicaid regulation was ripe for judicial review before a conformity hearing or funding termination occurred.
  2. Whether the State of Florida had standing to challenge the Secretary's regulation.
  3. Whether the non-state plaintiffs had standing under section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act to challenge the regulation.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (12)

  • Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136, 87 S. Ct. 1507, 18 L. Ed. 2d 681 (1967)(followed)
  • Toilet Goods Association v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 158, 87 S. Ct. 1520, 18 L. Ed. 2d 697 (1967)(followed)
  • Gardner v. Toilet Goods Association, 387 U.S. 167, 87 S. Ct. 1526, 18 L. Ed. 2d 704 (1967)(followed)
  • Columbia Broadcasting System v. United States, 316 U.S. 407, 62 S. Ct. 1194, 86 L. Ed. 1563 (1942)(analogized)
  • Frozen Food Express v. United States, 351 U.S. 40, 76 S. Ct. 569, 100 L. Ed. 910 (1956)(followed)
  • United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 U.S. 192, 76 S. Ct. 763, 100 L. Ed. 1081 (1956)(followed)
  • Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150, 90 S. Ct. 827, 25 L. Ed. 2d 184 (1970)(followed)
  • Barlow v. Collins, 397 U.S. 159, 90 S. Ct. 832, 25 L. Ed. 2d 192 (1970)(followed)
  • Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 88 S. Ct. 1942, 20 L. Ed. 2d 947 (1968)(followed)
  • Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S. Ct. 691, 7 L. Ed. 2d 663 (1962)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Download CaseDownload Case DataDownload Case and DataDownload AI Instructions

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Fifth Circuit