Summary
The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed a dissolution judgment in part but reversed the $13,980.33 credit awarded to the husband for post-separation mortgage payments. The court held that, because the husband had been primarily responsible for the mortgage during the marriage, he was not entitled to a credit for continuing those payments and remanded for an amended equitable distribution judgment.
Holdings
- A spouse should not receive a credit for post-separation mortgage payments when that spouse was the primary income earner and was generally responsible for paying the mortgage and other household expenses during the marriage.
- The dissolution judgment must be amended to remove Husband's house-payment credit and make the corresponding adjustment to the equitable distribution of the marital home.
Questions Presented
- Whether a spouse who was generally responsible for paying the mortgage and other household expenses during the marriage is entitled to a credit for post-separation mortgage payments on the marital home.
- Whether the equitable distribution portion of the dissolution judgment should be adjusted to remove the house-payment credit.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- Cortese v. Cortese, 72 So. 3d 269, 269 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)(followed)
- Kranz v. Kranz, 737 So. 2d 1198, 1202 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…