Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida granted rehearing, withdrew its prior opinion, and substituted this opinion. The court held that the trial court erred by admitting a videotaped police interrogation containing repeated detective statements accusing the defendant of lying and expressing opinions about her guilt. The court reversed the judgment and sentence and remanded for a new trial.
Holdings
- The trial court erred by admitting the objected-to portions of the videotaped interrogation in which detectives repeatedly accused Mackey of lying, described her as engaging in a pattern of lies, and expressed that she was guilty of being an accessory after the fact.
- The State failed to establish that the erroneous admission of the detectives' repeated accusations was harmless.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court erred by admitting a recorded police interrogation in which detectives repeatedly expressed opinions that Mackey was lying and was involved in the crime.
- Whether the erroneous admission of the detectives' repeated accusations was harmless.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (9)
- Eugene v. State, 53 So. 3d 1104, 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)(followed)
- Jackson v. State, 18 So. 3d 1016, 1031-32 (Fla. 2009)(cited)
- McWatters v. State, 36 So. 3d 613, 637 (Fla. 2010)(cited)
- Roundtree v. State, 145 So. 3d 963, 965, 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)(followed)
- Jackson v. State, 107 So. 3d 328, 339-42 (Fla. 2012)(followed)
- Page v. State, 733 So. 2d 1079, 1081 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(cited)
- Tumblin v. State, 29 So. 3d 1093, 1101 (Fla. 2010)(cited)
- Pausch v. State, 596 So. 2d 1216, 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)(cited)
- Gaines v. State, 155 So. 3d 1264, 1272 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…