United States v. Rodriguez-Morales

929 F.2d 780 (1st Cir. 1991) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · March 27, 1991 · No. No. 90-1955

Summary

The First Circuit reversed a district court order suppressing cocaine discovered in the defendant's vehicle. The court held that police reasonably impounded the vehicle under their community caretaking function after determining that neither occupant was properly licensed to drive, and that a canine sniff of the lawfully impounded vehicle was not a search under the Fourth Amendment. The positive canine indication supplied probable cause for a warrant to search the vehicle.

Holdings

  1. The initial stop was constitutionally valid because the officers had reasonable grounds to suspect that an altercation or reckless driving endangered the public.
  2. When a vehicle is lawfully stopped on a highway and no occupant is properly licensed to drive it, police may reasonably impound and remove the vehicle under their community caretaking responsibilities without probable cause to arrest the driver or search the vehicle.
  3. A canine sniff of the exterior of a vehicle lawfully in police custody is not a search under the Fourth Amendment and may be conducted without reasonable suspicion.
  4. The positive canine alert supplied probable cause for the officers to obtain a warrant to search the vehicle, and the warrant search was lawful.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the initial traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion.
  2. Whether officers could impound and move the vehicle to the police barracks under their community caretaking function without probable cause to arrest Rodriguez-Morales or search the vehicle.
  3. Whether a canine sniff of the exterior of a lawfully impounded vehicle is a search under the Fourth Amendment and requires reasonable suspicion.
  4. Whether the dog's alert supplied probable cause for a warrant to search the vehicle.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (39)

  • Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 110 S. Ct. 2793, 111 L. Ed. 2d 148 (1990)(followed)
  • United States v. Stanley, 915 F.2d 54, 57 (1st Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • United States v. Figueroa, 818 F.2d 1020, 1024 (1st Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • United States v. LaFrance, 879 F.2d 1, 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 439 (1984)(followed)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)(followed)
  • Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573-74 (1985)(followed)
  • United States v. Aymelek, 926 F.2d 64, 68 (1st Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • United States v. Lott, 870 F.2d 778, 781, 784 (1st Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 441, 447-48 (1973)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 39.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…