Summary
The First Circuit summarily affirmed the district court's reversal of the bankruptcy court's refusal to lift the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362. The court relied on the district court's reasoning and rejected the appellant's remaining arguments as insubstantial, without addressing whether the appeal was moot.
Holdings
- The district court did not err in reversing the bankruptcy court's refusal to lift the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362.
- The appeal presented no substantial question of law or fact, so the court summarily affirmed the judgment below.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court erred in reversing the bankruptcy court's refusal to lift the automatic stay.
- Whether the appeal presented a substantial question of law or fact warranting further review or remand.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- In re Unanue-Casal, 998 F.2d 28 (1st Cir. 1993)(cited)
- Unanue-Casal v. Unanue-Casal, 898 F.2d 839 (1st Cir. 1990)(cited)
- In re Unanue Casal, Civ. No. 92-1796 GG (D.P.R. Aug. 3, 1993) (unpublished)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…