Summary
The Louisiana First Circuit granted in part and denied in part a supervisory writ application arising from a summary judgment proceeding. The court reversed rulings overruling evidentiary objections to portions of an affidavit and to a sur-reply, but otherwise upheld the denial of defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Holdings
- Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 966 does not provide for the filing of a sur-reply; defendants' objection to the sur-reply was therefore sustained.
- Affidavit portions that are not based on the affiant's personal knowledge or that contain inadmissible hearsay should not be considered in deciding a motion for summary judgment.
- Excluding the challenged affidavit evidence did not establish error in the denial of defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 966 permits the filing of a sur-reply in connection with a motion for summary judgment.
- Whether portions of Rebecca Barnette's affidavit that were not based on personal knowledge and contained inadmissible hearsay could be considered in deciding the motion for summary judgment.
- Whether the denial of defendants' motion for summary judgment was erroneous after excluding the challenged affidavit evidence.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (1)
- Thomas v. Comfort Ctr. of Monroe, LA, Inc., 2010-0494 (La. App. 1st Cir. 10/29/10), 48 So. 3d 1228, 1236(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…