Summary
The First District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed Antron Colston’s convictions and life sentence for first-degree murder and armed robbery. The court held that GPS records containing handwritten markings were admissible under the business-records exception and that username information from cell phones was not inadmissible hearsay.
Holdings
- The handwritten marks did not make the GPS exhibit inadmissible under the hearsay rule or remove it from the business-records exception because Colston identified no authority prohibiting such marks on a business record and no record evidence showed that the marks were not made in the ordinary course of a regularly conducted business activity.
- The username information was not inadmissible hearsay because it was not established that the information was offered to prove the truth of a matter asserted, and the court rejected the argument that a username necessarily constitutes a statement establishing ownership.
Questions Presented
- Whether handwritten marks on GPS-record screenshots rendered the exhibit inadmissible hearsay despite the business-records exception.
- Whether username information, including an email address incorporating the victim's name, constituted inadmissible hearsay.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Cannon v. State, 180 So. 3d 1023, 1037 (Fla. 2015)(followed)
- Jean-Philippe v. State, 123 So. 3d 1071, 1080 (Fla. 2013)(followed)
- Thurston v. State, 307 So. 3d 714, 716 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…