Summary
The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal held that a non-signatory to a construction contract may enforce the contract’s arbitration provision when a signatory asserts claims against the non-signatory that arise directly from the contract. The court reversed the denial of the motion to compel arbitration and remanded with directions to grant the motion.
Holdings
- A nonsignatory to a contract may enforce the contract's arbitration provision against a signatory when the signatory's claims against the nonsignatory relate directly to the contract and rely on the contract.
Questions Presented
- Whether a nonsignatory to a construction contract may enforce the contract's arbitration provision when a signatory asserts claims against the nonsignatory that arise directly from the contract.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (3)
- Koechli v. BIP Int'l, Inc., 870 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)(followed)
- Roman v. Atl. Coast Constr. & Dev., Inc., 44 So. 3d 222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)(followed)
- Cuningham Hamilton Quiter, P.A. v. B.L. of Miami, Inc., 776 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…