Summary
The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to dismiss Steven McBride’s complaint with prejudice while an interlocutory appeal was pending. The appellate court vacated the dismissal and remanded, noting that the trial court may enter a new dismissal order after appellate jurisdiction has been restored.
Holdings
- Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(f), absent a stay, the lower tribunal may proceed with matters during review of a non-final order but may not render a final order disposing of the cause while that review is pending.
- A lower tribunal generally lacks jurisdiction to enter a final order disposing of the cause on the same day an appellate court dismisses an interlocutory appeal because full jurisdiction is not automatically restored until the appellate mandate issues.
- A final order entered without jurisdiction is a nullity and cannot be treated as harmless error; the order must be vacated.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter a final order dismissing the complaint with prejudice while an interlocutory appeal was pending.
- Whether dismissal of the interlocutory appeal automatically restored the trial court's full jurisdiction before issuance of the appellate mandate.
- What disposition was required for a final order entered without jurisdiction.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (5)
- Hersey v. Batchelor, 433 So. 2d 558, 559 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)(followed)
- Mandrachia v. Ravenswood Marine, Inc., 118 So. 2d 817, 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)(followed)
- Llanso v. Gomez de Cordova, 263 So. 3d 137, 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
- Dragomirecky v. Town of Ponce Inlet, 891 So. 2d 633, 634-635 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)(followed)
- Esposito v. Horning, 416 So. 2d 896, 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…