Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a circuit court decision concerning a candidate's compliance with the City of Miami's district residency qualification. The court relied on the City Charter and prior precedent holding that the residency requirement is a qualification to run for office and does not require continuous or immediately preceding residency.
Holdings
- The plain language of section 4(c) of the City of Miami Charter does not require continuous residency in the district or residency immediately preceding qualification.
- Section 102.168(3)(b), Florida Statutes, does not permit a post-election challenge based on a candidate's failure to meet the qualification requirements necessary to run for office.
Questions Presented
- Whether the City of Miami Charter's district-residency requirement requires continuous residency or residency immediately preceding a candidate's qualification.
- Whether a candidate's alleged failure to satisfy the charter's qualification requirements may be challenged after the election under section 102.168(3)(b), Florida Statutes.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- City of Miami v. Gabela, 390 So. 3d 65, 70 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)(followed)
- Leon v. Carollo, 246 So. 3d 490, 496-97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…