Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a dispute involving the effect of a tax deed on asserted rights or liens, commercial-property caveat emptor, and a claimed private remedy under a Miami-Dade County ordinance. The court relied on Florida Statutes section 197.552, related Florida case law, and the ordinance’s text.
Holdings
- The court affirmed the lower court, applying section 197.552, Florida Statutes, to conclude that no right, interest, restriction, covenant, or comparable lien at issue survived issuance of the tax deed.
- The court affirmed application of caveat emptor to the sale of commercial property.
- The court affirmed without implying a private remedy from the cited statutory provision and applied the cited Miami-Dade County Code liability provision as relevant to the disposition.
Questions Presented
- Whether the challenged right, interest, restriction, or covenant survived issuance of a tax deed.
- Whether a lien premised on unpaid association assessments survived issuance of a tax deed.
- Whether caveat emptor governed the sale of the commercial property.
- Whether the Miami-Dade County Code provision imposed liability enforceable in the circumstances presented.
- Whether a private remedy could be implied from the applicable statute.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Cricket Props., LLC v. Nassau Pointe at Heritage Isles Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 124 So. 3d 302, 307 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)(followed)
- Futura Realty v. Lone Star Bldg. Ctrs. (E.), Inc., 578 So. 2d 363, 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)(followed)
- Murthy v. N. Sinha Corp., 644 So. 2d 983, 986 (Fla. 1994)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…