Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a final order granting summary judgment in favor of Barbara Mena Herrera. The court discussed the standards governing summary judgment and emphasized that unsworn or unauthenticated documents do not constitute competent evidence under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510.
Holdings
- Summary judgment is proper when the movant demonstrates that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; the nonmoving party must then present counterevidence showing a genuine dispute.
- A party cannot satisfy the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(e) merely by attaching unsworn or unauthenticated documents to a summary-judgment motion. An unauthenticated document is not competent evidence unless otherwise authenticated.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court properly granted summary judgment under Florida's summary-judgment standard.
- Whether unsworn or unauthenticated documents may satisfy the procedural requirements for evidence supporting a motion for summary judgment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (9)
- Ibarra v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc., 350 So. 3d 465, 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)(followed)
- Betancourt v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 406 So. 3d 1011, 1013 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)(followed)
- Romero v. Midland Funding, LLC, 358 So. 3d 806, 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)(followed)
- Katha, LLC v. SHEDDF3-AE, LLC, 394 So. 3d 707, 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)(followed)
- Brevard County v. Waters Mark Dev. Enters., LC, 350 So. 3d 395, 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)(followed)
- In re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510, 309 So. 3d 192, 194 (Fla. 2020)(followed)
- Gidwani v. Roberts, 248 So. 3d 203, 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
- Freiday v. OneWest Bank, 162 So. 3d 86, 87 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)(followed)
- Daeda v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Fla., Inc., 698 So. 2d 617, 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…