Gregory Thomas v. State of Florida

Summary

The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed an order striking Gregory Thomas’s motion for clarification. The court relied on the supplemental record showing that Thomas had previously been prohibited from filing further pleadings in a self-represented capacity in the trial court.

Holdings

1. The order striking Thomas's motion for clarification is affirmed because the supplemental record showed that Thomas had previously been prohibited from filing further pleadings in a self-represented capacity in the trial court.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the trial court properly struck Thomas's motion for clarification after previously prohibiting him from filing further pleadings in a self-represented capacity.

Disposition

affirmed