Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed an interlocutory order denying Jean-Philippe Schneider’s pro se motion to disqualify opposing counsel. The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, emphasizing the deferential standard of review and the limited, drastic nature of attorney disqualification.
Holdings
- The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Schneider's motion to disqualify opposing counsel.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Schneider's motion to disqualify opposing counsel.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Stopa v. Cannon, 330 So. 3d 1033, 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)(followed)
- Applied Digit. Sols., Inc. v. Vasa, 941 So. 2d 404, 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(followed)
- Gutierrez v. Rubio, 126 So. 3d 320, 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)(followed)
- Alters v. Villoldo, 230 So. 3d 115, 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)(followed)
- Alexander v. Tandem Staffing Sols., Inc., 881 So. 2d 607, 608-09 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…