Lazaro Rodriguez v. Marciano Jaimes

Rodriguez v. Jaimes · Florida Third District Court of Appeal · November 5, 2025 · No. 3D24-0937

Summary

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal order in an appeal involving negligence claims against construction-related defendants. The court explained that its de novo review of a dismissal order is limited to the complaint and reiterated that a negligence duty based on control of property requires a legal duty to protect against injury.

Holdings

  1. On de novo review of a dismissal order, an appellate court looks no further than the complaint and treats all well-pled allegations as true.
  2. A duty to protect a person from injury on property is predicated on control of the property, including the right to control access; absent a legal duty, there is no cause of action for negligence.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the complaint stated a legally sufficient negligence claim based on a duty arising from control of property.
  2. Whether the trial court's dismissal order should be affirmed under the de novo standard governing review of a dismissal.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (3)

  • Chakra 5, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 254 So. 3d 1056, 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
  • Bechtel Corp. v. Batchelor, 250 So. 3d 187, 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
  • Seitz v. Surfside, Inc., 517 So. 2d 49, 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…