Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal order in an appeal involving negligence claims against construction-related defendants. The court explained that its de novo review of a dismissal order is limited to the complaint and reiterated that a negligence duty based on control of property requires a legal duty to protect against injury.
Holdings
- On de novo review of a dismissal order, an appellate court looks no further than the complaint and treats all well-pled allegations as true.
- A duty to protect a person from injury on property is predicated on control of the property, including the right to control access; absent a legal duty, there is no cause of action for negligence.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint stated a legally sufficient negligence claim based on a duty arising from control of property.
- Whether the trial court's dismissal order should be affirmed under the de novo standard governing review of a dismissal.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Chakra 5, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 254 So. 3d 1056, 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
- Bechtel Corp. v. Batchelor, 250 So. 3d 187, 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
- Seitz v. Surfside, Inc., 517 So. 2d 49, 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…