Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in an insurance coverage dispute involving late notice of loss and alleged breaches of post-loss obligations. The court relied on Florida precedent concerning waiver, presumed insurer prejudice, and the insured’s burden to rebut that presumption.
Holdings
- The insurer did not waive its untimely-notice defense merely by denying coverage on other grounds, including a policy exclusion, without raising untimely notice or prejudice in its coverage letter.
- Where an insured fails to provide prompt notice or substantially comply with post-loss obligations, prejudice to the insurer is presumed, and the burden shifts to the insured to present evidence rebutting that presumption; an issue concerning prejudice may be resolved on summary judgment when the insured presents insufficient rebuttal evidence.
Questions Presented
- Whether the insurer waived its untimely-notice defense by denying the claim on other grounds without raising untimely notice or prejudice in its coverage letter.
- Whether the record supported the lower court's resolution of the insured's late-notice and resulting prejudice issues.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Sec. First Ins. Co. v. Visca, 387 So. 3d 313, 316-18 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)(followed)
- Am. Integrity Ins. Co. v. Estrada, 276 So. 3d 905, 916 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)(followed)
- Nunez v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 325 So. 3d 267, 273-75 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)(followed)
- 1500 Coral Towers Condo. Ass'n v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 112 So. 3d 541, 544-45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)(followed)
- Perez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 343 So. 3d 140, 143-44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…