Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed most aspects of a final judgment of paternity establishing a parenting plan, timesharing schedule, and child support. The court reversed and remanded for correction of the judgment's failure to describe parent-child communication methods and for recalculation of child support based on the guidelines worksheet and timesharing allocation.
Holdings
- The final judgment impermissibly failed to describe the methods and technologies the parents would use to communicate with the child, as required by section 61.13(2)(b)(4), Florida Statutes (2024).
- The child-support award could not stand because it contravened the monthly net income reflected on the child-support guidelines worksheet attached to the judgment and was inconsistent with the percentage of timesharing awarded to the parties.
- The remaining issues did not warrant reversal, and the judgment was summarily affirmed in all other respects.
Questions Presented
- Whether the final judgment of paternity complied with the statutory requirement to describe the methods and technologies the parents would use to communicate with the child.
- Whether the child-support award was reversible because it conflicted with the monthly net income reflected on the attached child-support guidelines worksheet and the parties' awarded timesharing percentages.
- Whether the remaining issues raised by the father warranted reversal.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (3)
- Campbell v. Jara, 392 So. 3d 1104, 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024)(followed)
- Skelly v. Skelly, 300 So. 3d 342, 345 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)(followed)
- Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…