Summary
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Arthur O. Armstrong's motion for leave to file a complaint. The court found no reversible error and adopted the district court's reasoning without oral argument.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court erred in denying Armstrong's motion for leave to file a complaint.
Holdings
- The district court's denial of Armstrong's motion for leave to file a complaint did not constitute reversible error and was affirmed.
Key quotations
“We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.” (2)
“Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.” (2)
Factual background
The opinion contains few substantive facts. Armstrong sought leave to file a complaint in the district court, and the district court denied that motion. The Fourth Circuit concluded that the record and the district court's order disclosed no reversible error.
Procedural history
The United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina denied Armstrong's motion for leave to file a complaint. Armstrong appealed, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order on the district court's reasoning.