Summary
The court held that payments made without an agreed appropriation applied to the earlier items of the account, including charges for hitch-posts and fence stone, thereby precluding the respondents from contesting whether those items were lienable. It further held that materials furnished under an entire oral contract for constructing a block of dwelling-houses on one lot supported a lien on the whole estate.
Holdings
- When payments are made on an account current without an appropriation by either party, the law applies them to the earlier items of the account.
- Materials furnished under an entire contract for the construction of a block of dwelling-houses situated on one lot support a lien upon the whole estate for the value of the materials furnished.
Questions Presented
- Whether payments made without an appropriation by the parties must be applied to the earlier items of the account, thereby satisfying the charges for the hitch-posts and fence stone.
- Whether materials furnished under an entire contract for the construction of a block of five houses situated on one lot support a lien on the whole estate.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Crompton v. Pratt, 105 Mass. 255(followed)
- The A. R. Dunlap, 1 Lowell, 350, 361(applied)
- Wall v. Robinson, 115 Mass. 429(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…