Summary
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court considered whether the Massachusetts Division of Medical Assistance had authority to require hospitals to return Medicaid payments when a liable third-party insurer was identified after payment. The court held that 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(25)(B) requires the State or local agency to seek reimbursement directly from the liable third party, rather than requiring compliant providers to repay the Medicaid program and rebill the third party. The court affirmed the judgment annulling the administrative decisions and declaring the reimbursement regulation unlawful to that extent.
Holdings
- Section 1396a(a)(25)(B) requires the State or local Medicaid agency to seek reimbursement from a liable third party when cost effective; it does not authorize the agency to shift that recovery obligation to a healthcare provider that properly received Medicaid payment.
- The Division lacked authority to enforce 130 Code Mass. Regs. § 450.316(E) to require hospitals that complied with the due diligence regulation to return properly received Medicaid payments and rebill liable third parties.
- The possibility that the Division might have difficulty recovering from Medicare did not justify interpreting § 1396a(a)(25)(B) to permit recovery from the hospitals.
Questions Presented
- Whether 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(25)(B) authorizes or requires a State Medicaid agency to recover Medicaid payments from healthcare providers rather than seek reimbursement directly from liable third parties.
- Whether the Division of Medical Assistance had authority to enforce 130 Code Mass. Regs. § 450.316(E) against providers that had complied with the Division's due diligence regulation and properly received Medicaid payments.
- Whether the possibility that the Division might be unable to recover from Medicare justified interpreting the federal statute to permit provider recoupment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- Haley v. Commissioner of Pub. Welfare, 394 Mass. 466, 467, 472, 474 (1985)(followed)
- Thomas v. Commissioner of the Div. of Med. Assistance, 425 Mass. 738, 746, 748 (1997)(followed)
- Tarin v. Commissioner of the Div. of Med. Assistance, 424 Mass. 743, 750 (1997)(followed)
- Massachusetts Hosp. Ass'n v. Department of Pub. Welfare, 419 Mass. 644, 652 (1995)(followed)
- Massachusetts Hosp. Ass'n v. Department of Med. Sec., 412 Mass. 340, 342, 345-346 (1992)(followed)
- Kszepka's Case, 408 Mass. 843, 847 (1990)(followed)
- Raytheon Co. v. Director of the Div. of Employment Sec., 364 Mass. 593, 595 (1974)(followed)
- Wesley Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. DeBuono, 244 F.3d 280, 281-282 (2d Cir. 2001)(distinguished)
- Cohen v. Commissioner of the Div. of Med. Assistance, 423 Mass. 399 (1996)(followed)
- New York State Dep't of Social Servs. v. Bowen, 846 F.2d 129, 132-134 (2d Cir. 1988)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.