In re Allan Yon Kwong Wong

442 Mass. 1016 (2004) · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · August 11, 2004

Summary

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court partially reverses the denial of Allan Yon Kwong Wong's second petition for reinstatement to the bar. The court concludes that Wong demonstrated the moral qualifications required for reinstatement but failed to provide sufficient evidence of legal competence and learning. The case is remanded for further proceedings concerning his paralegal work, continuing legal education, competence, and the effect of reinstatement on the integrity of the bar and the public interest.

Holdings

  1. Wong established the moral character required for admission to practice law in Massachusetts.
  2. Wong did not present sufficient evidence at the hearing to establish the competency and learning in law required for reinstatement.
  3. The case should be remanded for further proceedings before the Board of Bar Overseers concerning Wong's competence and learning in the law, his completed continuing legal education, and whether reinstatement would compromise the integrity and standing of the bar, the administration of justice, or the public interest.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Wong demonstrated the moral qualifications required for reinstatement to the Massachusetts bar.
  2. Whether Wong presented sufficient evidence of competency and learning in the law to support reinstatement.
  3. Whether the case should be remanded to permit additional evidence concerning Wong's legal work and continuing legal education and to reconsider the effect of reinstatement on the integrity and standing of the bar, the administration of justice, and the public interest.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (5)

  • State v. Wong, 138 N.H. 56 (1993)(cited)
  • Matter of Pool, 401 Mass. 460, 463-464 (1988)(cited)
  • Matter of Dawkins, 16 Mass. Att'y Discipline Rep. 94, 95 (2000)(distinguished)
  • Matter of Waitz, 416 Mass. 298, 304, 306 (1993)(cited)
  • Matter of Dawkins, 432 Mass. 1009, 1011 (2000)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…