Summary
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Peymon and April Mottahedeh’s action arising from a tax investigation and asserting claims under the Freedom of Information Act. The court held that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over Agent Tambornini because service was improper and properly dismissed the FOIA claims without leave to amend.
Holdings
- The district court properly dismissed the claims against Agent Tambornini for lack of personal jurisdiction because he was never properly served.
- The district court did not err by dismissing the FOIA claims sua sponte.
- The district court did not err by dismissing the action without leave to amend.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court properly dismissed the claims against Agent Tambornini for lack of personal jurisdiction because he was not properly served.
- Whether the district court properly dismissed the FOIA claims sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
- Whether the district court erred by dismissing without granting leave to amend.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- FDIC v. British-Am. Ins. Co., 828 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Scholastic Entm't, Inc. v. Fox Entm't Group, Inc., 336 F.3d 982, 985 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 234 (9th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc., 143 F.3d 1293, 1298 (9th Cir. 1998)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…