Franks Landing Indian Cmty. v. National Indian Gaming Comm'r

Franks Landing Indian Cmty. v. National Indian Gaming Comm'r, 918 F.3d 610 (9th Cir. 2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · March 12, 2019 · No. 17-35368

Summary

The Ninth Circuit held that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) unambiguously requires federal recognition by the Secretary of the Interior as a prerequisite for a tribe to engage in Indian gaming. The court also held that the Frank's Landing Act, as amended in 1994, did not separately authorize the non-federally recognized Frank's Landing Indian Community to conduct Class II gaming under IGRA. The court affirmed summary judgment for the Department of the Interior, concluding the Community was ineligible for IGRA gaming.

Holdings

  1. IGRA clearly and unambiguously requires federal recognition by the Secretary before a tribe may qualify to participate in Indian gaming.
  2. The Frank's Landing Act does not authorize the Community to engage in Class II gaming.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an Indian group must be recognized by the Secretary of the Interior to qualify as an 'Indian tribe' for purposes of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA).
  2. Whether the Frank's Landing Act, as amended in 1994, authorizes the non-federally recognized Frank's Landing Indian Community to engage in Class II gaming under IGRA.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (21)

  • Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 48 (1996)(discussed)
  • Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 843-44 (1984)(discussed)
  • Cty. of Amador v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 872 F.3d 1012, 1020 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Alaska Wilderness League v. Jewell, 788 F.3d 1212, 1217 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Artichoke Joe's California Grand Casino v. Norton, 353 F.3d 712, 720 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. U.S. Dep't of Interior, 824 F.3d 807, 809 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. Ryan, 415 F.3d 986, 990-91 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 325 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)(followed)
  • F.A.A. v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 284, 291-92 (2012)(discussed)
  • Dolan v. U.S.P.S., 546 U.S. 481, 486 (2006)(discussed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…